All Time player stats legend

Short version:

The methodology basically consisted of combining a few readily-available indicators of value to a team: Win Shares (explained at basketball-reference.com), PER (using the PER numbers available at basketball-reference.com), seasons played in a Jazz uniform (more time played with a team generally means more value provided for that team), and NBA honors (such as All Star appearances, All NBA 1st, 2nd, or 3rd team recognition, All Rookie team recognition, All Defensive team recognition, MVP shares, and Defensive Player of the Year recognition). While I recognize that some of the NBA honors are simply popularity contests, on the margins I thought that achieving such an honor merited some consideration. It also helped recognize players like Mark Eaton, who would rank only 76th all time in the PER category, for other valuable contributions (such as at the defensive end of the court -- though much of that was already picked up by Win Shares, which includes defensive contributions).

The methodology certainly is subjective and could use some tweaking, but it provides some degree of comfort to see Malone and Stockton atop the list and John Amaechi at the very bottom.

----------------------------
Long version

FWIW, here is the methodology I used:

1. I calculated an adjusted PER for each player -- which is essentially the ratio of the player's PER to the league average of 15 (i.e., ADJ PER = PER/15). The reason I wanted to do this was to so I could give the player credit for providing value above or below the value provided by a league average player. Again, I recognize that PER is an imperfect measure of value, but it is the best readily-available aggregation of a player's value of which I am aware.

2. I multiplied each player's total Win Shares accumulated while in a Jazz uniform by Adjusted PER. As noted above, the idea here was to give additional credit to players who performed above league average while helping the team win and reduce the value provided by players who performed below league average -- even though they might have contributed to some wins over their careers.

3. To this, I added 1 point for every league honor or award they received while in a Jazz uniform. The league honors and awards credited here included All Star recognition, All NBA 1st, 2nd, or 3rd team recognition, All Defense teams, and All Rookie teams. I also added 10 points for every MVP Share received by a Jazzman and 10 points for every Defensive Player of the Year award received. The reason I gave 10X the points here was that there are 15 All NBA players every season, 24 All Stars, etc., but only 1 MVP and only 1 DPOY. Note that only 9 Jazz players had "MVP Shares" (Malone had 4.296, Stockton had .161, Dantley had .151, AK had .002, Eaton had .009, DWill had .009, Boozer had .006, Rickey Green had .011, and Maravich had .069) and only 1 Jazzman won DPOY (Eaton won it twice). So Malone got a 43-point bump from his MVP shares and Eaton got a 20-point bump from his DPOY awards. No one else received much of a bump at all from these two categories. But, I do believe it was significant that Malone was twice believed (read: voted) to be the best player in the NBA and that Eaton was twice believed to be the very best defensive player in the NBA -- and they got additional credit for that.

4. There is also some argument or school of thought that the "best" player is the player who had the very best season in a Jazz uniform (hence, some of the arguments that Truck Robinson was a better player than Boozer). To give these "one-season-wonders" some additional credit, I then added to the score each player's career highest PER while in a Jazz uniform. This did provide a bit of a bump to some players, such as Maravich, John Drew, et al., who may not have had the total Win Shares, but who did have at least one really good season in a Jazz uniform.

5. Finally, while longevity has already been measured in part by total win shares, it did seem that someone like Jarron Collins who played for 8 seasons and 480 games in a Jazz uniform while accumulating 15.3 win shares should get a little credit for spending far more time in a Jazz uniform than, say, Ty Corbin, who accumulated 16.3 win shares in only 3 seasons and less than half of the games that Collins played. So I added one more point for each season spent in a Jazz uniform. Obviously, then, Stockton got 19 points, Malone got 18, Eaton got 11, and so on. (Note that Corbin still edged out Collins. He was just a better player than Collins.)

That's it in a nutshell. I'm sure there are a lot of bases for criticizing the methodology, but it seemed like a decent first crack given the data I had readily available.